New Disease Reports (2016) 33, 7. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2016.033.007]
Get pdf (848 KB)

Natural infection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

J. Van Vaerenbergh 1*, B. De Paepe 1, A. Hoedekie 1, C. Van Malderghem 1, J. Zaluga 2, P. De Vos 2,3 and M. Maes 1,2

*johan.vanvaerenbergh@ilvo.vlaanderen.be

Show affiliations

Received: 05 May 2015; Published: 01 Feb 2016

Five tomato plants cv. ‘Merlice’ on Maxifort rootstock were received late April 2014 from a substrate crop in Flanders, Belgium. They exhibited yellowing and necrosis of the leaf mesophyll, withering of leaflets and wilting of whole leaves. Vascular tissues were probed at various nodes along the stem because explicit discolouration of the xylem was not observed. The tissues were fragmented in sterile 10 mM phosphate buffer (PB) and the dilution was plated on Pseudomonas Agar F containing 5g/l of sucrose. Creamy white colonies developed from the diluted extracts after seven days incubation at room temperature (Fig. 1). An isolate from each diseased tomato plant (designated GBBC 1958 to GBBC 1962) was identified as Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus (Cms) in taxon-specific conventional PCR (Pastrik & Rainey, 1999) and TaqMan real-time PCR (Schaad et al., 1999). The isolates were also assigned to the gyrB sequence cluster of Cms (Fig. 2) with unique subspecies signatures and displayed specific biomarker proteins of Cms in MALDI-TOF (Fig. 3) (Zaluga et al., 2011). The vascular tissue extracts tested positive for Cms in an immunofluorescence test with polyclonal antiserum (Prime Diagnostics, The Netherlands) and with the monoclonal antibody 9A1 (Agdia Biofords, France). They tested negative for C. m. subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) in an immunofluorescence test with polyclonal antiserum (Prime Diagnostics, The Netherlands).

Pathogenicity of the five isolates was tested to tomato and potato using suspensions of about 108 cells/ml in PB. Tomato plantlets with two fully developed leaves were inoculated by stem infiltration (Zaluga et al., 2013) and placed in a growth chamber at 20-25°C. High-grade seed tubers cv. ‘Fontane’ were inoculated by dipping a potato knife in the cell suspension and making a longitudinal cut from the heel end over about two-thirds of the tuber. After overnight retention at 16°C, they were hand planted in preformed ridges in a contained field plot at ILVO. Buffer-inoculated controls separated each test object. The type strains of Cmm and Cms were used as pathogenic controls. In tomato plantlets, the five Cms isolates displayed flaccidity and chlorosis of leaf margins, wilting or necrosis of individual leaf parts and finally wilting of whole leaves (Fig. 4). The first symptoms appeared 10-12 days after inoculation and progressed slowly. In potato plants, the five Cms isolates caused a general burnt appearance with rolling and necrosis of leaf margins, mottling and yellowing between veins (Fig. 5). Ring rot symptoms were identified in the progeny tubers and confirmed by TaqMan PCR. Each isolate was recovered from infected test plants and re-identified as Cms by the gyrB barcode.

Although tomato is considered a host upon artificial inoculation, this is to our knowledge the first report of a natural infection of C. m. subsp. sepedonicus in tomato plants. The incidence in the crop was limited to ten successively arranged plants in one row, suggesting transmission from a primary infected plant but at a low rate. The origin of the infection is unknown. Inspection of tomato crops issued from the same seed lot did not result in additional findings. The official status of the pathogen in Belgium is reported as under eradication on tomato and absent on potato (EPPO, 2014). The five isolates are deposited at the LMG collection (strain numbers 28446-28450). The corresponding gyrB sequences are available in NCBI (GenBank Accession Nos. KP899559-KP899663).

Figure1+
Figure 1: Result of dilution plating of vascular stem tissue from tomato cv. ‘Merlice’ on Pseudomonas Agar F.
Figure 1: Result of dilution plating of vascular stem tissue from tomato cv. ‘Merlice’ on Pseudomonas Agar F.
Figure2+
Figure 2: GyrB classification of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus isolated from tomato (GBBC 1958 -1962) and reisolated from potato.
Figure 2: GyrB classification of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus isolated from tomato (GBBC 1958 -1962) and reisolated from potato.
Figure3+
Figure 3: Biomarker proteins in MALDI-TOF profile of isolate GBBC 1960 (LMG 28448).



Figure 3: Biomarker proteins in MALDI-TOF profile of isolate GBBC 1960 (LMG 28448).



Figure4+
Figure 4: Pathogenicity of isolate GBBC 1960 to tomato displaying flaccidity and wilting of leaf margins.
Figure 4: Pathogenicity of isolate GBBC 1960 to tomato displaying flaccidity and wilting of leaf margins.
Figure5+
Figure 5: Pathogenicity of isolate GBBC 1960 to potato cv. ‘Fontane’ displaying rolling and necrosis of leaf margins, interveinal mottling and yellowing.
Figure 5: Pathogenicity of isolate GBBC 1960 to potato cv. ‘Fontane’ displaying rolling and necrosis of leaf margins, interveinal mottling and yellowing.

References

  1. EPPO, 2014. Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus found on tomato in Belgium. EPPO Reporting Service 10, 2014/190. https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-3283
  2. Pastrik KH, Rainey FA, 1999. Identification and differentiation of Clavibacter michiganensis subspecies by polymerase chain reaction-based techniques. Journal of Phytopathology 147, 687-693. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.1999.00442.x]
  3. Schaad NW, Berthier-Schaad Y, Sechler A, Knorr D, 1999. Detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus in potato tubers by BIO-PCR and an automated real-time fluorescence detection system. Plant Disease 83, 1095-1100. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.12.1095 ]
  4. Zaluga J, Heylen K, Van Hoorde K, Hoste B, Van Vaerenbergh J, Maes M, De Vos P, 2011. GyrB sequence analysis and MALDI-TOF MS as identification tools for plant pathogenic Clavibacter. Systemic and Applied Microbiology 34, 400-407. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2011.05.001]
  5. Zaluga J, Van Vaerenbergh J, Stragier P, Maes M, De Vos P, 2013. Genetic diversity of non-pathogenic Clavibacter strains isolated from tomato seeds. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 36, 426-435. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2013.04.005 ]

To cite this report: Van Vaerenbergh J, De Paepe B, Hoedekie A, Van Malderghem C, Zaluga J, De Vos P, Maes M, 2016. Natural infection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). New Disease Reports 33, 7. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2016.033.007]

©2016 The Authors