New Disease Reports (2013) 28, 4. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2013.028.004]
Get pdf (600 KB)

First report of Sweet potato virus C infecting sweet potato in Israel

S. Prakash 1, Y. Tam 1, M. Zeidan 2, A. Abu-Ras 2 and V. Gaba 1*

*vpgaba@volcani.agri.gov.il

Show affiliations

Received: 25 Apr 2013; Published: 20 Sep 2013

Keywords: Ipomoea batatas, sweet potato virus disease, viral synergism

In October 2011 sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) mother plants (mainly cv. Georgia Jet) in Israel suffered an epidemic of sweet potato virus disease (SPVD). The plants were of poor appearance, grew feebly and showed strong leaf malformation, mosaic, purpling, chlorosis, cupping, vein yellowing and occasional feathery mottle symptoms (Figs. 1-3). SPVD is the result of synergism between Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV, genus Crinivirus) and either Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV, genus Potyvirus) or Sweet potato mild mottle virus(genus Ipomovirus)(Tairo et al., 2005; Clark et al., 2012). RNA extraction was performed on leaves from symptom-bearing plants using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA). First strand cDNA synthesis was performed with a RevertAid cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific Molecular Biology, Waltham, MA, USA). Potyvirus-degenerate primers corresponding to the cylindrical inclusion protein gene were used in PCR (Ha et al., 2008). A distinct ~700 bp amplicon was obtained from five symptom-bearing plants. The amplicon was cloned and sequenced and was shown to correspond to the Sweet potato virus C (SPVC) Bungo isolate (Yamasaki et al., 2010). The entire nucleotide sequence (10,828 nts excluding the 3′-terminal poly (A) tail) of the Israeli SPVC isolate was determined using overlapping primers from the Bungo strain (Yamasaki et al., 2010) and deposited in GenBank (Accession No. JX489166). The Israeli strain had 98% identity to the Bungo strain at the nucleotide level and 99% at the amino acid level. SPVC is a distant variant of SPFMV (Tairo et al., 2005) that has been known for many years in Israel based on symptom appearance and immunological tests (Cohen et al., 1988).

No other potyvirus was found by RT-PCR in the SPVD-affected mother plants. SPVD was transmitted by graft inoculation from the SPVD-plants to virus-indexed sweet potato cv. Derby and to SPCSV-infected sweet potato cv. Georgia Jet. Inoculations were confirmed by symptoms and RT-PCR. SPVC was transmitted by mechanical inoculation to Nicotiana benthamiana with strong mosaic symptoms. Field samples obtained from March to June 2012 were screened by RT-PCR using the degenerate potyvirus primers described above and new SPVC-specific primers (forward 5′- CAAATCAACAGGTTTGCCTTTTTAT-3′ and reverse 5′-AGTTCATCGACTTCATTGTAACTTG-3′).PCR conditions were as in Ha et al. (2008), but with an annealing temperature of 56°C, which generated the expected 520 bp fragment. Of 170 field samples (each composed of 25 leaf samples) collected from all four major sweet potato growing areas in Israel, 46 (27%) were SPVC-infected. To our knowledge this is the first report of SPVC in Israel.

Figure1+
Figure 1: Sweet potato cv. Georgia Jet showing sweet potato virus disease symptoms of dwarfing, short internodes and distorted leaves.
Figure 1: Sweet potato cv. Georgia Jet showing sweet potato virus disease symptoms of dwarfing, short internodes and distorted leaves.
Figure2+
Figure 2: Feathery mottle, leaf distortion and vein yellowing in sweet potato cv. Georgia Jet with sweet potato virus disease.
Figure 2: Feathery mottle, leaf distortion and vein yellowing in sweet potato cv. Georgia Jet with sweet potato virus disease.
Figure3+
Figure 3: Leaf chlorosis in sweet potato cv. Georgia Jet with sweet potato virus disease.
Figure 3: Leaf chlorosis in sweet potato cv. Georgia Jet with sweet potato virus disease.

Acknowledgements

Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel, No. 512/12. Photo credits – Dani Shavit.


References

  1. Clark CA, Davis JA, Abad JA, Cuellar WJ, Fuentes S, Kreuze JF, Gibson RW, Mukasa SB, Tugume AK, Tairo FD, Valkonen JPT, 2012. Sweetpotato viruses: 15 years of progress on understanding and managing complex diseases. Plant Disease 96,168-185. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-11-0550]
  2. Cohen J, Salomon R, Loebenstein G, 1988. An improved method for purification of sweet potato feathery mottle virus directly from sweet potato. Phytopathology 78, 809-811. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-78-809]
  3. Ha C, Coombs S, Revill PA, Harding RM, Vu M, Dale JL, 2008. Design and application of two novel degenerate primer pairs for the detection and complete genomic characterization of potyviruses. Archives of Virology 153, 25-36. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-007-1053-7]
  4. Tairo F, Mukasa SB, Jones RAC, Kullaya A, Rubaihayo PR, Valkonen JPT, 2005. Unravelling the genetic diversity of the three main viruses involved in Sweet Potato Virus Disease (SPVD), and its practical implications. Molecular Plant Pathology 6, 199-211. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00267.x]
  5. Yamasaki S, Sakai J, Fuji S, Kamisoyama S, Emoto K, Ohshima K,Hanada K, 2010. Comparisons among isolates of Sweet potato feathery mottle virus using complete genomic RNA sequences.Archives of Virology 155, 795-800. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0633-0]

To cite this report: Prakash S, Tam Y, Zeidan M, Abu-Ras A, Gaba V, 2013. First report of Sweet potato virus C infecting sweet potato in Israel. New Disease Reports 28, 4. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2013.028.004]

©2013 The Authors